In a highly regulated industry like medical devices, staying updated on industry trends and regulatory changes is crucial for success. Focusing solely on internal product knowledge (Option b) is insufficient, as it neglects the broader market dynamics and competitive landscape. Ignoring industry trends (Option d) can lead to missed opportunities and a lack of strategic foresight. While attending industry conferences is beneficial, it is only one aspect of staying informed. The most comprehensive approach (Option a) involves actively reading industry publications, attending conferences, and engaging with regulatory updates to understand the competitive landscape and emerging trends. This proactive approach allows Stryker to anticipate market shifts, adapt its strategies accordingly, and maintain a competitive edge. By staying informed, employees can make better decisions, identify new opportunities, and contribute to Stryker’s long-term success. This continuous learning approach also fosters a culture of innovation and adaptability within the organization.

Stryker’s commitment to innovation and patient safety necessitates a robust understanding of both ethical considerations and adaptability in crisis management. The best response acknowledges the immediate need to protect patient well-being, adheres to the company’s ethical guidelines, and incorporates a flexible approach that allows for adjustments based on evolving information and circumstances. This requires quickly assessing the situation, prioritizing patient safety above all else, transparently communicating with relevant stakeholders (including regulatory bodies if necessary), and demonstrating a willingness to adapt the response as new information becomes available or as the crisis evolves. A strong answer will also reflect a commitment to learning from the crisis to prevent similar incidents in the future, aligning with Stryker’s continuous improvement culture. The critical aspect is balancing immediate action with ethical considerations and long-term learning. A failure to prioritize patient safety or a rigid adherence to protocol without considering the specific context would be detrimental.

The most effective approach involves a multi-faceted strategy. First, the candidate must acknowledge the change in strategic direction communicated by the CEO. This requires adaptability and flexibility. Next, they need to proactively identify potential resistance within their team and other departments (Teamwork and Collaboration). They must then develop a communication plan that clearly articulates the rationale behind the shift, addressing potential concerns and highlighting the benefits (Communication Skills). Crucially, they need to actively solicit feedback and adapt the implementation plan based on this feedback (Adaptability and Flexibility, Communication Skills). Finally, they must demonstrate leadership by motivating their team to embrace the new strategy and providing support during the transition (Leadership Potential). Simply acknowledging the change or focusing solely on individual tasks is insufficient. Neglecting potential resistance or failing to communicate effectively will hinder successful implementation. Avoiding feedback loops and failing to adapt the plan will also limit its effectiveness. The correct answer demonstrates a holistic approach that integrates multiple behavioral competencies. It shows understanding of Stryker’s value of prioritizing patient outcomes, which is reflected in the CEO’s strategic shift.

The most effective approach in a dynamic, matrixed organization like Stryker involves understanding the interconnectedness of different departments and the potential impact of a decision on various stakeholders. Prioritizing a comprehensive risk assessment (including financial, legal, and operational risks) is crucial. This means not only identifying potential downsides but also understanding the potential benefits of each path, and how those benefits align with Stryker’s overall strategic goals. Moreover, a collaborative approach, involving key stakeholders from different departments, allows for a more holistic perspective and can help identify potential blind spots. This ensures buy-in and shared ownership of the decision, facilitating smoother implementation and mitigating potential conflicts. Finally, the decision-making process should be transparent and well-documented, to ensure accountability and facilitate future learning. This is especially important in a regulated industry like medical devices, where compliance and ethical considerations are paramount.

The most effective approach balances immediate needs with long-term strategic goals. While immediate customer needs are paramount, neglecting process improvements and strategic vision can lead to future inefficiencies and missed opportunities. Focusing solely on immediate issues without considering the broader context is reactive and unsustainable. Conversely, prioritizing long-term goals while ignoring immediate customer concerns can damage relationships and erode trust. A balanced approach involves addressing urgent customer issues while simultaneously identifying and implementing process improvements that enhance efficiency and customer satisfaction in the long run. This also involves communicating a clear strategic vision to the team, aligning their efforts with the company’s overall objectives, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement. This ensures both short-term customer satisfaction and long-term organizational success. The ideal response demonstrates an understanding of Stryker’s commitment to both customer excellence and operational efficiency, aligning individual actions with broader strategic goals.

The most effective approach is one that acknowledges the initial misstep, demonstrates a commitment to understanding the underlying issue, and proactively seeks solutions to rectify the situation and prevent recurrence. This involves several key steps: First, acknowledging the error directly to the client, Ms. Ramirez, with transparency and empathy is crucial. Second, investigating the root cause of the incorrect product recommendation is essential to prevent similar errors in the future. This may involve reviewing the client’s initial needs assessment, the product recommendation process, and the rep’s training on product knowledge and client needs analysis. Third, immediately offering a suitable alternative product or solution that aligns with Ms. Ramirez’s requirements demonstrates a commitment to customer satisfaction. This might involve consulting with product specialists or senior team members to identify the best possible solution. Fourth, implementing a corrective action plan, such as additional training on product differentiation and needs assessment, ensures that the sales representative and the team are better equipped to handle similar situations in the future. Finally, maintaining open communication with Ms. Ramirez throughout the resolution process helps rebuild trust and reinforces the company’s commitment to service excellence. This approach not only addresses the immediate problem but also demonstrates a proactive and learning-oriented mindset, which is highly valued at Stryker.

The most effective approach involves a combination of active listening, understanding the underlying reasons for resistance, and collaborative problem-solving. Simply enforcing a new methodology without addressing concerns can lead to resentment and decreased productivity. Ignoring the concerns of experienced team members can result in the loss of valuable insights and expertise. Dismissing the new methodology outright without proper evaluation can hinder potential improvements. Encouraging open dialogue, acknowledging the value of past practices, and involving team members in the adaptation process fosters a sense of ownership and promotes a smoother transition. This approach aligns with Stryker’s values of collaboration, innovation, and customer focus by ensuring that new methodologies are implemented in a way that considers the needs and perspectives of all stakeholders. The focus should be on demonstrating the benefits of the new methodology, addressing any perceived drawbacks, and providing adequate training and support to ensure successful adoption. This approach also mitigates risks associated with resistance to change, such as decreased productivity, increased errors, and employee turnover.

The most effective approach involves a multi-faceted strategy that emphasizes proactive risk identification, clear communication, and iterative adaptation. Proactive risk identification, aligned with Stryker’s commitment to quality and patient safety, enables the team to anticipate potential challenges arising from resource constraints. Clear communication, mirroring Stryker’s emphasis on transparency and collaboration, ensures that all stakeholders are informed about potential impacts and mitigation strategies. Iterative adaptation, reflecting Stryker’s focus on continuous improvement, allows the team to refine its approach based on real-time feedback and changing circumstances. A reactive approach, while necessary in certain situations, is less desirable as it addresses issues only after they have arisen, potentially leading to delays or compromised quality. Ignoring constraints or focusing solely on one aspect of the project neglects the interconnectedness of project elements and can lead to unforeseen consequences. Therefore, the best approach is a balanced and adaptive strategy that prioritizes proactive planning, open communication, and continuous improvement, all vital for project success within Stryker’s demanding environment.

In high-pressure situations, especially during a crisis, clear and timely communication is essential for managing the situation effectively and maintaining stakeholder confidence. Withholding information (option b) can lead to mistrust and exacerbate the crisis. Blaming others (option c) is unproductive and can damage team morale and relationships. Ignoring the crisis (option d) is irresponsible and can have severe consequences. The most effective approach involves promptly acknowledging the crisis, gathering accurate information, communicating transparently with stakeholders, and coordinating a response plan to mitigate the impact of the crisis. This demonstrates strong crisis management skills and leadership.

The most effective approach is to proactively identify potential conflicts and address them constructively before they escalate. This involves fostering open communication, actively listening to differing viewpoints, and seeking collaborative solutions that address the underlying needs and concerns of all parties involved. Ignoring the conflict or solely relying on HR intervention as a first step can lead to increased tension, decreased productivity, and damage to team relationships. While adhering strictly to company policy is important, it should be balanced with empathy and a willingness to understand individual perspectives. Premature escalation to HR without attempting internal resolution can also undermine team autonomy and create a culture of distrust. The key is to create a safe space for dialogue and problem-solving within the team, empowering members to address disagreements respectfully and find mutually acceptable outcomes. This proactive approach aligns with Stryker’s values of integrity, accountability, and people, fostering a positive and productive work environment.

The most effective approach involves proactive communication and collaboration with the team to address the changing priorities. This entails clearly explaining the rationale behind the shift, actively listening to any concerns or reservations team members might have, and collaboratively adjusting individual tasks and timelines to align with the new priorities. It’s crucial to acknowledge the potential impact on team members’ workloads and provide support to mitigate any negative effects. Transparency and open dialogue can foster a sense of shared understanding and commitment to the revised goals. Simply reassigning tasks without explanation can lead to resentment and decreased morale. Ignoring concerns can damage trust and hinder effective teamwork. Waiting for team members to voice concerns may delay necessary adjustments and exacerbate potential problems. While individual conversations are important, initiating a team-wide discussion ensures everyone is on the same page and can contribute to the solution. Delaying communication until the next scheduled meeting is insufficient when priorities have significantly shifted.

Stryker, as a leading medical technology company, operates within a highly regulated environment where ethical decision-making and compliance are paramount. When faced with conflicting priorities, especially those involving patient safety, regulatory requirements, and business objectives, the ethical course of action must always prioritize patient well-being and adherence to legal and regulatory standards. This approach aligns with Stryker’s commitment to integrity and its responsibility to healthcare professionals and patients. The long-term sustainability of the company depends on maintaining a reputation for ethical conduct and trust, which outweighs short-term gains from compromising patient safety or regulatory compliance. In this case, delaying the product launch to address the identified safety concern ensures that Stryker is not putting patients at risk and is meeting its legal obligations. This action demonstrates a commitment to Stryker’s core values and mitigates potential legal and reputational damage. Furthermore, transparency and communication with regulatory bodies are essential to maintaining trust and credibility.

In a fast-evolving environment like Stryker’s, where regulatory landscapes, technological advancements, and competitive pressures are constant, adaptability is paramount. A product recall necessitates a rapid and coordinated response across multiple departments (Regulatory Affairs, Supply Chain, Marketing, and Sales). The most effective response involves not only addressing the immediate crisis but also learning from it to prevent future occurrences. This requires a proactive approach to risk assessment, robust communication channels, and a willingness to adjust strategies based on new information. Simply adhering to existing protocols (though important) isn’t sufficient; the situation demands a flexible approach that considers the unique circumstances of the recall and its potential impact on the company’s reputation and financial performance. Ignoring cross-functional collaboration or failing to adapt communication strategies to different stakeholders can exacerbate the crisis and damage long-term relationships. A well-executed response demonstrates Stryker’s commitment to patient safety, regulatory compliance, and continuous improvement, all core values of the company. Furthermore, quickly adjusting marketing and sales strategies is vital to mitigate negative impacts on revenue and market share, highlighting the importance of adaptability in maintaining business performance.

A proactive, collaborative, and solutions-oriented approach is most effective. When faced with a significant budget cut impacting a Stryker research and development project, it’s essential to first thoroughly analyze the budget reduction’s impact on project scope, timelines, and deliverables. Next, proactively engage the R&D team to brainstorm creative solutions and identify areas where efficiencies can be achieved without compromising the project’s core objectives or safety standards. This collaborative approach fosters a sense of ownership and encourages innovative thinking. Communicating transparently with stakeholders, including senior management and potential investors, about the challenges and proposed solutions is crucial for maintaining trust and securing support. Exploring alternative funding sources or partnerships can also help to mitigate the impact of the budget cut. Simply accepting the budget cut without exploring options, sacrificing essential safety measures, or shifting blame are detrimental to the project’s success and Stryker’s reputation.

The most effective approach involves a combination of strategies, emphasizing transparent communication, collaborative problem-solving, and a proactive stance in addressing potential conflicts arising from the changing priorities. This response aligns with Stryker’s value of integrity by ensuring transparency and fairness in the decision-making process. The team’s morale and productivity can be maintained through open communication, active listening, and a collaborative approach to problem-solving. This approach also reflects a customer-centric approach by ensuring that the project’s objectives are met while minimizing disruption to the team. This involves clearly communicating the rationale behind the changes, actively soliciting input from team members, and working together to identify solutions that address both the project’s needs and the team’s concerns. This includes acknowledging the team’s initial plan, explaining the external factors driving the need for change, and outlining the potential benefits of the new direction. Moreover, it’s crucial to ensure that all team members have a clear understanding of the new priorities, their individual roles, and the revised timelines. This may involve providing additional training or resources to support team members in adapting to the changes.

The most effective approach is to proactively identify potential conflicts, facilitate open communication to understand all perspectives, and collaboratively develop solutions that address the underlying issues while aligning with Stryker’s values and operational needs. This demonstrates initiative, conflict resolution skills, and an understanding of Stryker’s collaborative culture. Avoiding the issue or unilaterally imposing a solution can damage team morale and productivity, while solely relying on management intervention abdicates personal responsibility and hinders the team’s ability to resolve issues independently. Promptly addressing the conflict and working towards a mutually agreeable resolution will foster a more positive and productive work environment. This approach aligns with Stryker’s emphasis on teamwork, ethical conduct, and proactive problem-solving. Delaying action or avoiding the conflict can lead to escalation and negatively impact project timelines and team dynamics. Taking ownership and facilitating a collaborative solution demonstrates leadership potential and a commitment to team success.

The best approach involves a combination of strategic planning, clear communication, and collaborative problem-solving. First, it’s crucial to conduct a thorough risk assessment to identify potential vulnerabilities in the supply chain, such as reliance on single suppliers, geopolitical instability, or natural disasters. This assessment should consider both short-term and long-term risks. Next, develop a diversified sourcing strategy that includes multiple suppliers for critical components and materials, reducing reliance on any single source. This strategy should also consider geographic diversification to mitigate the impact of regional disruptions. Establish clear communication channels with suppliers to ensure timely information sharing and proactive identification of potential disruptions. This communication should include regular performance reviews and contingency planning discussions. Maintain a sufficient inventory of critical components and materials to buffer against short-term disruptions, while avoiding excessive inventory costs. This inventory management strategy should be based on demand forecasting and lead time analysis. Finally, develop a comprehensive business continuity plan that outlines the steps to be taken in the event of a supply chain disruption, including alternative sourcing options, production adjustments, and customer communication strategies. This plan should be regularly tested and updated to ensure its effectiveness.

Ethical decision-making requires a careful consideration of all stakeholders’ interests and a commitment to upholding company values and ethical principles. In this scenario, the sales representative should first consult Stryker’s code of conduct and ethical guidelines to determine the appropriate course of action. They should then assess the potential impact of accepting the gift on their objectivity and impartiality, as well as on Stryker’s reputation. If the gift is deemed to be excessive or could be perceived as influencing their decisions, the sales representative should politely decline the gift, explaining Stryker’s policy on accepting gifts from clients. Alternatively, they could accept the gift on behalf of Stryker and donate it to a charitable organization. Accepting the gift without considering its ethical implications or reporting it to their supervisor would be a violation of Stryker’s ethical standards. Similarly, rudely rejecting the gift could damage the client relationship. The ideal approach demonstrates a strong commitment to ethical conduct, adherence to company policies, and respect for client relationships.

The most effective response acknowledges the shift in priorities and the need to adjust the team’s approach. It involves actively communicating the change to the team, understanding their concerns, and collaboratively adjusting the project plan. This demonstrates adaptability, leadership, and teamwork. Simply accepting the change without team input or rigidly sticking to the original plan would be less effective. Ignoring the team’s potential concerns and not adjusting the plan could lead to resistance and project delays. The best approach balances the need to adapt to the new priorities with the need to maintain team morale and project momentum. It involves active communication, collaboration, and a willingness to adjust the plan based on team input. In the context of Stryker, where innovation and agility are crucial, quickly adapting to market demands and incorporating changes into ongoing projects is a valuable skill. This ensures that Stryker remains competitive and meets the evolving needs of healthcare professionals and patients. Effective communication and collaboration are essential to maintain team alignment and project success.

In a rapidly evolving medical device market, Stryker emphasizes adaptability, leadership, teamwork, and ethical decision-making. When faced with conflicting strategic directions, a candidate must prioritize ethical considerations, foster collaborative decision-making, and communicate transparently with stakeholders. This approach aligns with Stryker’s commitment to integrity, innovation, and customer-centricity. The correct response demonstrates an understanding of these core values and the ability to navigate complex situations effectively. Ignoring ethical considerations or unilaterally imposing a direction would be detrimental to Stryker’s reputation and culture. A reactive or passive approach fails to demonstrate leadership and initiative. The ideal response reflects a proactive, ethical, and collaborative approach to conflict resolution, consistent with Stryker’s values and business objectives. It also recognizes the importance of data-driven decision-making and the need to balance competing priorities while maintaining a focus on patient safety and regulatory compliance.

The most effective approach involves proactively anticipating potential disruptions and implementing mitigation strategies *before* they impact team performance. This includes fostering open communication channels to identify early warning signs, cross-training team members to provide backup support, and establishing clear contingency plans for various scenarios. Regularly reviewing and updating these plans ensures they remain relevant and effective. While addressing issues reactively is necessary, a proactive stance minimizes the negative impact on team productivity and morale. Simply relying on individual resilience or solely focusing on quick resolutions after problems arise is insufficient for sustained high performance in a dynamic environment. Therefore, preemptive planning and resource allocation are essential for adaptability and maintaining team effectiveness.

The core of adaptability within Stryker’s fast-paced environment lies in the ability to proactively adjust strategies based on evolving market needs and regulatory changes, while maintaining team motivation and clear communication. Option A highlights this multifaceted approach, combining strategic pivoting with leadership and communication. Option B represents a passive approach, lacking proactive adaptation. Option C focuses solely on technical adjustments, neglecting the crucial leadership and communication aspects required for successful change management within Stryker. Option D emphasizes individual skill development but fails to address the necessary strategic and collaborative dimensions of adaptability in a team-oriented environment. At Stryker, adaptability involves not just personal flexibility but also the ability to guide and support the team through transitions, ensuring alignment with company goals and maintaining a positive and productive work environment. It requires a blend of strategic thinking, effective communication, and proactive problem-solving to navigate complex challenges and capitalize on emerging opportunities. Effective adaptation also ensures compliance with evolving regulations and maintains Stryker’s competitive edge in the medical technology industry.

This question assesses a candidate’s ability to balance customer satisfaction with company policies and ethical considerations. The best response involves acknowledging the customer’s frustration, empathizing with their situation, and offering a reasonable solution within the bounds of company policy. Directly refusing the refund without offering an alternative solution would likely escalate the situation and damage the customer relationship. Immediately approving the refund without investigating the situation could set a precedent and potentially lead to fraudulent claims. While involving a supervisor might be necessary in some cases, it is preferable to attempt to resolve the issue directly with the customer first. The most effective approach demonstrates a commitment to customer service, problem-solving, and adherence to company policies. It also reflects Stryker’s values of integrity and customer focus. It’s important to remember that building strong customer relationships is crucial for long-term success, and resolving issues fairly and efficiently is essential for maintaining customer loyalty.

The most effective approach balances the need for adaptability with the preservation of team morale and strategic direction. While flexibility is crucial, abandoning a well-considered strategy entirely in response to minor setbacks or dissenting opinions can lead to instability and inefficiency. Ignoring feedback, however, stifles innovation and risks alienating team members. Similarly, rigidly adhering to the initial plan without considering new information or alternative perspectives demonstrates a lack of adaptability. The best course of action involves acknowledging the concerns raised, re-evaluating the strategy in light of the feedback, and making necessary adjustments while clearly communicating the rationale behind any changes to maintain team alignment and confidence in the overall direction. This demonstrates both adaptability and leadership by showing a willingness to adjust while maintaining strategic focus and team cohesion, reflecting Stryker’s values of integrity, accountability, and people. This approach fosters a culture of continuous improvement and open communication, essential for navigating the complexities of the medical technology industry.

The most effective approach combines elements of adaptability, leadership, and communication. Adaptability is crucial because the initial strategy failed, necessitating a pivot. Leadership is needed to guide the team through the change and maintain morale. Communication is vital for clearly explaining the new direction, addressing concerns, and ensuring buy-in. A directive approach risks alienating the team and stifling innovation, while a purely collaborative approach may take too long and lack clear direction in a crisis. Ignoring the failed strategy and continuing as planned is clearly not viable. Therefore, a balanced approach is essential for navigating the situation successfully and aligning the team towards a revised goal. This situation also highlights the importance of psychological safety within the team, where members feel comfortable voicing concerns and suggesting alternative approaches. Furthermore, the leader’s ability to articulate the rationale behind the shift in strategy and address potential resistance will be critical for ensuring a smooth transition and maintaining team cohesion. The success of the revised strategy hinges on the leader’s capacity to foster a shared understanding and commitment to the new direction.

The most effective approach to handling this scenario involves a multi-faceted strategy that prioritizes immediate risk mitigation, clear communication, and proactive collaboration. First, the candidate should immediately escalate the issue to the compliance department and legal counsel, as this situation directly implicates potential violations of anti-kickback statutes and regulatory compliance, particularly relevant in the medical device industry. This ensures that Stryker’s established protocols for handling such matters are followed meticulously. Second, the candidate should initiate a transparent and documented communication channel with the hospital administration, specifically the ethics and compliance officers, to disclose the identified concerns. This proactive approach demonstrates Stryker’s commitment to ethical conduct and allows for collaborative problem-solving. The candidate should then temporarily suspend the surgeon’s involvement in Stryker-sponsored training programs and consulting engagements, pending a thorough internal investigation. This action minimizes further potential conflicts of interest and safeguards Stryker’s reputation. Finally, the candidate should work closely with the sales team to ensure continued support for the hospital’s needs, while strictly adhering to ethical and legal guidelines. This demonstrates Stryker’s dedication to maintaining a strong client relationship without compromising its integrity. The rationale behind this approach is rooted in the need to balance business objectives with stringent ethical and legal obligations. Failing to address the potential conflict of interest promptly and transparently could expose Stryker to significant legal and reputational risks, including potential fines, sanctions, and damage to its brand image. By prioritizing compliance, communication, and collaboration, the candidate demonstrates a commitment to upholding Stryker’s values and protecting its long-term interests.

The most effective approach involves a multi-faceted strategy focusing on proactive identification, structured communication, and collaborative problem-solving. Proactively identifying potential conflicts early on allows for preventative measures and minimizes escalation. Open and structured communication ensures that all team members are aware of the challenges and potential solutions. This includes regular check-ins, clear articulation of priorities, and transparent decision-making processes. Furthermore, a collaborative problem-solving approach encourages team members to contribute their expertise and perspectives, leading to more innovative and effective solutions. This also fosters a sense of ownership and shared responsibility, which can enhance team cohesion and resilience. Finally, regularly reviewing and refining the adaptation strategies ensures continuous improvement and alignment with evolving project needs and organizational goals. This cyclical process allows for the incorporation of lessons learned and best practices, thereby enhancing the team’s ability to navigate future challenges effectively. This demonstrates adaptability and flexibility, which are key behavioral competencies for success within Stryker’s dynamic environment.

The most effective response involves demonstrating adaptability by first acknowledging the change in direction, then proactively reassessing priorities based on the new information, and finally, communicating the adjusted plan transparently to all stakeholders. This showcases flexibility, strategic thinking, and strong communication skills, all crucial for leadership potential at Stryker, especially given the dynamic nature of the medical device industry. A simple acceptance of the new direction without reassessment could lead to misallocation of resources and missed opportunities. Ignoring the change or passively waiting for further instructions demonstrates a lack of initiative and leadership. While consulting with a manager is important, taking the lead in reassessing and communicating the revised plan is a more proactive and effective approach that aligns with Stryker’s values of integrity and accountability. The ideal approach balances autonomy with seeking guidance when necessary, ultimately driving results in a changing environment.

In this scenario, the most effective approach aligns with Stryker’s emphasis on adaptability, ethical decision-making, and customer focus. Directly escalating to the sales director without attempting to understand the client’s perspective or explore alternative solutions demonstrates a lack of problem-solving skills and potentially damages the client relationship. While documenting the interaction is important, it is insufficient as a standalone action. Offering a standard discount without understanding the root cause of the dissatisfaction is a reactive measure that doesn’t address the underlying issue. The best course of action involves actively listening to the client’s concerns, empathizing with their frustration, and collaborating with internal teams to find a mutually acceptable resolution that aligns with Stryker’s values and maintains the client relationship. This proactive approach demonstrates adaptability, strong communication skills, and a commitment to customer satisfaction, all critical for success at Stryker. Furthermore, it reflects an understanding of the long-term value of client relationships over short-term gains. Ignoring the issue or delegating it without proper context fails to address the client’s immediate concerns and can further erode trust.

The optimal response balances the need for thorough investigation with the urgency of addressing a potential ethical violation. Immediately initiating an internal investigation is crucial to gather facts and determine the validity of the allegations. Temporarily reassigning the employee to non-supervisory duties during the investigation protects potential victims and prevents further ethical breaches. Engaging legal counsel ensures that the investigation is conducted in accordance with legal requirements and that appropriate actions are taken based on the findings. Providing support and resources to potential victims demonstrates Stryker’s commitment to their well-being and fosters a safe and respectful work environment. While documenting the allegations is important, it is not sufficient on its own. Ignoring the allegations or conducting a superficial investigation would be unethical and potentially illegal. Publicly accusing the employee without due process would be unfair and could lead to legal repercussions.